Managed Care for children’s mental health is a bad idea

It’s only a matter of time before we learn that some insurance company reviewer decided that the treatment Adam Lanza needed, and that might have saved dozens of lives, wasn’t “medically necessary” and refused to fund it.  Almost nobody knows that Medicaid funding for a child’s mental health treatment has been available for decades to children with disabilities in Connecticut regardless of family income (and in 35 other states as well).  State Medicaid Agencies and the Managed Care Organizations they support do their best to ration and restrict access to those funds.  Adam was certainly eligible for funding through the Medicaid EPSDT mandate in Connecticut that could have enabled him to receive treatment for his socialization and communication deficits.  Having that treatment might have helped him just like it has been helping children in Pennsylvania with similar challenges for decades.  In Pennsylvania, knowledge of Medicaid’s EPSDT funding potential has been more widely distributed because of a series of lawsuits that pulled back the curtain.  Parents throughout the US need to learn that Medicaid funding for in-home and in-school mental health treatment exists so their children who are developing symptoms of mental illness can get early, effective, intensive in-home and in-school treatment — it’s actually a Civil Right in the Social Security Act — that can make all the difference in the world.

Watch this video to learn how EPSDT funding for mental health treatment of children can be secured in all 50 states.

Here is a link to a summary of Federal regulations that explain how Medicaid-eligible children have enforceable rights to EPSDT funding for the treatment of their mental illness symptoms.